Sonia Delaunay at the Tate Modern: 15 April to 9 August 2015
This is a brief summary of two articles that were published in the
Guardian newspaper on 28 March and on 14 April 2015. Both articles previewed the retrospective exhibition
of work by Sonia Delaunay which opened at the Tate Modern on 15 April and which
runs until 9 August.
The first article to be published was by Kathleen Jamie and was entitled
‘The dance goes on’.
The second article to be published was by Adrian Searle and was entitled
‘Fascinating rhythms’.
Sonia Delaunay at the Tate Modern: 15 April to 9 August
Kathleen Jamie on Sonia Delaunay
The article by Kathleen Jamie describes Sonia Delaunay’s origin in
Odessa, Ukraine, and the move that she made as a child to live with her uncle
and aunt in St.Petersburg. Sonia
Delaunay was Jewish.
Sonia Delaunay married – as a convenience – Wilhelm Uhde, who was
homosexual. This enabled Sonia to leave
Russia and settle in Paris. The marriage
ended in divorce, and in 1910 Sonia and Robert Delaunay married and became
‘quite the avant-garde power couple’.
Delaunay was painting before she left Russia: her works appear to have
been influenced by Gauguin. She worked
figuratively and in abstraction.
The Delaunays counted as friends Kandinsky and Chagall, and the poets
Apollinaire and Cendras.
The blanket that Sonia Delaunay stitched for her young son in 1911 is
included in the show: it indicates her move from figurative work to
abstraction; it shows Russian folk art merging with 20th Century
Paris. The blanket is an early example
of Sonia Delaunay’s ‘simultane’ style.
Sonia worked increasingly in needlework – maybe to give her husband
space to paint. Her style showed Russian
folk art influences. The ‘simultane’
style - which both Sonia and Robert practised - juxtaposed contrasting colours
and shapes to create lively movement and rhythm.
The Delaunays’ easy movement in the avant garde of the arts was stopped
by the Russian Revolution. This ended
Sonia’s income from property that she had owned in St.Petersburg. Sonia’s needlework skills came to the fore
and she designed ballet costumes and sold textiles and clothing, and had her
own fashion house – ‘Sonia’.
The question is posed: Sonia’s aesthetic was unvarying but her works
became dominated by marketing and commerce, so ‘is it art, or design, or both
at once?’ Kathleen Jamie also expresses
the question by referring to the ‘simultane’ motif of opposites placed
alongside each other to make a unified and attractive whole. Jamie suggests that Sonia Delaunay was
engaged in ‘performance art’.
The Nazi occupation forced Sonia and Robert to move to the south of
France. Robert Delaunay died in 1941 and
Sonia took up painting again in an abstract style.
Sonia died in 1979.
An essay in the exhibition catalogue by Griselda Pollock presents Sonia
Delaunay as a feminist pioneer whose significance became lost as the art
history of the 20th Century came to be written in the 1950s by
‘masculinist fogeys’. Sonia Delaunay
‘moved fluidly between art and design’ and this reduced her perceived
significance in comparison with her painter husband. The task now is to see Sonia’s works fully in
their own light.
Sonia Delaunay is quoted as having said: ‘Abstract art is only important
if it is the endless rhythm where the very ancient and the distant future
meet’.
Adrian Searle on Sonia Delaunay
Adrian Searle also describes Sonia Delaunay’s origins in Ukraine and
Russia and her move to Paris. Searle
refers to Wilhelm Uhde’s role as an art critic and dealer, who knew
Picasso. Uhde showed the work of Henri
Rousseau and gave Sonia an exhibition.
Searle praises the Tate Modern exhibition: it originated in Paris.
Sonia Delaunay is described as having ‘sought to extend art into the
everyday and the broader material culture’.
Her clothes were ‘paintings to be worn’.
No comments:
Post a Comment